Ignoring what’s right in front of you

23 Sep 2023 | Confirmation bias

The first step in overcoming confirmation bias is to check the facts, even if you’re tempted to take them at face value. But doing so is not always straightforward. My TED talk opened with how Belle Gibson claimed to have beaten cancer through diet. Since Belle’s medical records are private, the person on the street can’t easily check this claim

But sometimes confirmation bias is so strong that it kicks in even if the facts are staring you in the face, and no checking is necessary. In 2018 I came across a paper by Harvard professor Mark Roe arguing that the business world is far less short-termist than people think. A big chunk of my research is on the dangers of short-termism and how to cure it — so I was tempted to either ignore the paper or read it with the mindset of trying to pick it apart. But one of the downsides of giving a talk on confirmation bias is that it forces me to practice what I preach. Reluctantly, I read it as open-mindedly as I could — and realised that many of Roe’s arguments were well-founded.

I feared that this bias might not be unique to me. To test this, I posted the following on Twitter:

The graph was taken from Roe’s paper, and is one of his key pieces of evidence that short-termism is not a problem — research and development (R&D) spending has risen over the last 40 years, as a percentage of GDP. But my Tweet claimed the exact opposite — that there had been a ‘huge fall in R&D since 1977’ and that this was ‘smoking gun evidence of short-termism.’

While I provided a link to the paper, you didn’t even need to click on it to see that my quote was false. The graph showed, clear as day, that the line was going up. But many people retweeted and liked my post, probably because they also believed capitalism to be short-termist and latched onto anyone claiming this, even though my claim was clearly false. Here’s one of the retweets:

My post never mentioned ‘maximising share value’, ‘increased executive pay’, ‘long-term productivity loss’ or ‘increased inequality’, and the graph showed a rise in investment which is good for productivity. Confirmation bias causes you to see whatever you want to see — even if both words and pictures show something completely different.

Was Rachel Reeves British Girls U14 Champion – and does it matter?

Was Rachel Reeves British Girls U14 Champion – and does it matter?

"I am – I was – a geek. I played chess. I was the British girls under-14 champion." So said Rachel Reeves in a Guardian interview. The Independent, Sky News, and Reuters ran similar headlines: They claimed that her chess ability would lead to her becoming a successful chancellor. Reeves herself said "I've learned to think ahead, to plan a strategy." The BBC turned it into a broader political narrative about sexism and private schools: "Growing up, Reeves was driven around the country by her parents to compete and beat privately educated boys, often as the only state ...
Ultra-Processed Evidence

Ultra-Processed Evidence

Chris van Tulleken’s “Ultra-Processed People: Why Do We All Eat Stuff That Isn’t Food … And Why Can’t We Stop?”, on the dangers of Ultra-Processed Food (UPF), was one of the most successful books of 2023. It was a #1 Sunday Times Bestseller and an Economist, Daily Mail, Good Housekeeping, and Amazon Book of the Year. Even now (January 2025) it’s still #9 in the Amazon charts, having spent 88 weeks in the top 20. Due to its popularity, I’d heard about it before reading it, and the punchlines resonated strongly with me. I try to eat home-cooked meals wherever possible, consume very ...
The study that never was

The study that never was

In March 2022, my LinkedIn feed lit up with people sharing this article: It is by Reuters, a highly-respected news source, on a report by Arabesque, an asset manager and data provider I greatly admire and wrote about in Grow the Pie. It was taken at face value and shared uncritically by LinkedIn Top Voices, such as the post below with 415 Likes and 92 comments: One of these comments, by another LinkedIn Top Voice, claimed that "Diverse boards do better period" and that this evidence could be used against the "non converted". The "period" implies that the issue is open-and-shut, ...
No results found.